Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

26/10/2016

Dear Sh. Roy

I find nothing well said in these two posts. You had clarified IAC position on Common Civil Code. But these two replies say nothing except ranting on the poll promises made in 1914 election. I am extremely disappointed on the level of discussion on such an important issue as this one. The matter is before the Supreme Court and as usual they have asked views of the Stake holders. Law ministry may have loaded it while circulating the questionaire. But if you are against it say so and give argument in favour of it or against it or what are the difficulties the G0vt. will face in implementing it or is it the right time to take up when the countries is totally focussed in dousing fire in J&K which is stoked from across the border and it will give an added ground for inflaming the situation.

I am myself against it even for Hindus which was done so hurriedly by Nehru and it is now the right time to go into it. 

There are similarities between Hindus and Islamists as both believe in God as an entity. Both believe in the soul and difference arisies only as to what happens afte death. Bothe believe in revelations -Muslims through Koran and Hindus throu VEDAS. So also the are laws governing life including marriage,divorce etc. But th difference arises- when Hindus beleive it is a sacrament but the Muslim treat it as a contract. Now for all these issues who is to decide these ate cenyal to the religion and these are not essentials. Surely all these issues need to be discussed by th e communities rather than hurling abusises on each other.

Therefore my request is either the discussion should be meaningful or You as the convenor should put across your point of view before the law Commission.   
Regds JKGaur

---

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresRegds ists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of sudhaman rama <sudhaman23@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 11:06 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

 

Well said Mr Dalvi, Sudhaman

---

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Rajinder Dalvi <rajinder.dalvi@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 6:02 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

 

Very well said

Corrupt political BJP class is just using the U.C.C as another divertory trick to distract people from their failure and jhumlas. The other puppet party AAP is also practiced in such copybook RSS strategms

After 2-1/2 years of BJP-AAP-RSS misrule, crony capitalism and mock nationalism we the people of India are asking Mr.Modi the real questions - 

Where are your promised jobs ?

Where is your ache din ?

Where is the 15 lakhs of black money in every Indian"s bank account ?

Modi sahab you have opened 12 million bank accounts but they are all as empty as your promises. Who will fill these poor people's accounts - that Vijai Mallya who your police allowed to flee the country or your close buddy Adani who owes 72,000+ crores to PSU banks after you politicos forced to lend to him and equallind to debt of all farmer of India?

Here Hindustani farmers are committing suicide, but Modi goes to Mozambike and Brazil to beg for land to grow cheap dal and sugarcane for Adani, Birla.and Bajaj.

Here Modi claims surgical strike in Pakistan but throughout it Adani keeps exporting onion and potato to Pakistan.

The blood of every true Hindustani is boiling over against these kamineey who want to impose their Hindu Rastra through their ghar-waapasi and love-jihaad. But they should first ask themself

Oh ye who speak of 4 wives and 4 children for UCC, first Weep on the condition of your Hindu ruler's own abandoned wife who has to beg her husband's office to know how her husband was given a passport without her.

Is such a man who refuses to confirm his marital status worth of ruling over this proudly secular desh, or should it be a Ramrajya where every Hindu wife will suffer like Modi's ?

Shame Shame Shame,.Hari Om

RP Dalvi

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Munish

I am proud that India is the most secular country in the world. I believe that all of us should strive to keep it that way and allow each religion (and their adherents) to practice, profess and propagate their religion and conscience (subject to morality, health and public order)

So if anybody objects to polygamy or triple talaq, they should either amend the Constitution or establish that these practices are immoral or unhealthy or opposed to public order. In 66 years of the Republic, AFAIK nobody has been able to do so - because official census data (and as a paedri MD you must know this) shows that Indian Muslims have much lower child mortality rates than Hindus, have longer life-spans than Hindus and the sex-ratio for Muslims is far better than for Hindus.

I don't know which party you are with presently, ie. after AAP,  so I can't comment on "some other parties becoming dominant", but if you are implying that Muslims are changing the demographics through polygamy and triple-talaq the ground-reality is different.

NB : IAC is, and shall always be, "bold" :-)

Sarbajit

.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Dr. Munish Raizada <pedia333@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Sarabjit ji:

Your several points are well taken regarding Hindutva and Akhand Hindustan vis a vis objectives of IAC. This is a bold statement. 

However, criticizing RSS will only create diversion. 

Also, opposing UCC at this juncture will harm the nation in long run. In decades, we have an opportunity to bring in UCC. It is unimaginable if some other parties become dominant.

Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAP

Board Certified Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054

Skype: munish.raizada

Editor-in-Chief:  http://www.newsgram.com/