Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

This is one of the most absurd controversy (if it is at all) I have ever come across.
 
An NRI (say Mr. ABC) is just an Indian Citizen, who is OUT of India for more than 183 days in any Financial Year (FY), for Income Tax purposes. He may be off and on even in India for work purposes too. Say he is in India for 165 days in any Financial Year, and the balance 200 days say in USA
 
There can be various possibilities.
 
1)      Mr. ABC donates to AAP, while he is in India, (during those 165 days) using his Indian Bank's Debit Card, through net banking, out of his Indian savings. Why should any law, stop Mr. ABC from donating his money to AAP, just because he stays out of India from more than 183 days in a FY, for work purposes, and thus becomes an NRI. Is working abroad for more than 183 days in a FY, and thus become an NRI automatically be default for Income Tax purposes, a crime??
 
2)      Say the same Mr. ABC in now using his Indian Bank's Debit Card, from USA, and donating to AAP, through net banking, out of his Indian Savings. Why again should any law, stop Mr. ABC from donating his money to AAP from abroad through Net Banking.  
 
 
I understand, plenty of NRI's are donating through net banking to AAP, using their Indian Debit Cards. And then who would decide, the money which goes to AAP, from the NRI's Indian Bank Account, is from Indian sources or not. It would naturally be a mixture of both from Indian and abroad sources.
 
An NRI also has to pay Indian Income Tax for his interest earnings in Banks in India. In any case, the NRI also pays his Indian Income Tax online, through his very same Indian Bank's Debit Card, sitting abroad. Why should Mr. ABC now be stopped from using the very same Indian Bank's Debit Card, for donating to AAP ???
 
Is there any similar absurd restrictions in paying Mr. ABC's Indian Income Tax dues online for his Taxable Indian Banks Interests from the so called 'foreign sources' ???? If anybody knows of any such absurd rules than an NRI can NOT pay his Indian Income Taxes dues online using his say USA Banks's Debit Card (through paypal or otherwise) and the so called 'foreign sources', then please let the forum know.


On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 3:50 PM, Sainik Sangh <gs@sainiksangh.org> wrote:
NRIs are the biggest threat to India next to TALIBAN only
maj gen (rtd) chauhan
 
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Bina Goel
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections
 
yesterday at indore congress was painted as KASANGRESS while as this should have been painted as KANS GRACE- poll address by rahul can only be appreciated by persons who want to get benefited by CHAPLOOSI of rahul and sonia and these are diggi manish punia khurshid sheela manmohan and lot many persons like these. i do not appreciate immature lecture by him like crores of indian citizen and this will prove after election result of states and parliament-dr.g.k.goel 
 
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
Sec 2(j)(x) of FCRA only defines a citizen of another country as a foreign sourcr and not a citizen of India even if resident abroad .So acceptance of any donation from a non resident Indian Citizen is fully permissible.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:45 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ravi
>
> Congress has too many big shot advocates and fixers, same goes for
> BJP, who know law at their fingertips. Poor AAP only has Prashant
> Bhushan, who made an ass of himself in High Court on the last to last
> hearing, and also failed to turn up on 23.Oct.
>
> The language of the law is clear, no money from overseas sources can
> be accepted by any political party. Prashant Bhushan made out some
> convoluted argument in court that they had been cleared of these
> charges in IAC times - Judge told him - IAC was not a political party,
> and in any case money went to PCRF and not IAC as you deposed in SC.
> AAP is a political party and will be reinvestigated for its sources of
> funding from the date you formed the party - 26.Nov.2012 !!~
>
> Then Bhushan made another silly argument - If NRIs now have the right
> to  vote (since 2010) then they have equally right to finance
> candidates for local elections and their money is not from a "foreign
> source". Hon'ble Judge asked him to read the definition of "foreign
> source" in FCRA - that shut him up (his face turned red) and he didn't
> show his face next hearing but sent his junior.
>
> The way it will now be rigged is the FCRA investigation of the foreign
> funds - which will be controlled by Congress (MHA - Chiddu). AAP was
> always a Congress dog, now they will be a LEASHED Congress dog. Who
> knows - Sonia may even make AK as her next CM for Delhi. Already all
> the top AAP brass are said to still have FIRs / cases pending (for
> rioting, destruction of public property etc.) so they are themselves
> eliminated by their own code of conduct.
>
> BJP knows this, I wouldn't be surprised if they try some appeal to
> AK's fake "Gandhian/Swarajist" conscience - Modi, Anna, Ramdev and
> other "eminent" citizens like Ramdas, Tahiliani,  VKS, Govindacharya
> etc. etc. may request that AAP should vacate the field in national
> interest and all sons and daughters of Bharat-mata should come
> together again to defeat anti-Swaraj forces..
>
> Ask yourself the real question, If AAP "kids" trip up on such
> elementary points of law, can we trust them to run 1 State let alone
> the Country without help from wiser people ?
>
> On 10/24/13, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wow! I thought it was the Congress that was THE foreign financed party and
>> liable to be banned for FCRA violations. How can AAP align with them?
>>
>> regards n bw
>>
>> ravi
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear IAC friends
>>>
>>> In a potentially welcome Delhi HC decision today for democracy, the
>>> foreign financed party is liable to be banned for FCRA violations..The
>>> Hoible Court has set the next date as 10 Dec 2013 2 days after the
>>> election
>>> result.
>>>
>>> This may influence AAP to side with Congress in event of a split verdict.
>> --
>> Veteran Major P M Ravindran
>> http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com
>>
>> You may also like to visit:
>> 'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com
>> http://www.judicialreforms.org/
>> http://www.roguepolice.com
>> http://milapchoraria.tripod.com
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

do u have any knowledge why we r not getting our rank pay arrears(pension) part.


On Wednesday, 30 October 2013 2:30 AM, Sainik Sangh <gs@sainiksangh.org> wrote:
----- Forwarded Message -----

Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (gs@sainiksangh.org) Add cleanup rule | More info
NRIs are the biggest threat to India next to TALIBAN only
maj gen (rtd) chauhan
 
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Bina Goel
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections
 
yesterday at indore congress was painted as KASANGRESS while as this should have been painted as KANS GRACE- poll address by rahul can only be appreciated by persons who want to get benefited by CHAPLOOSI of rahul and sonia and these are diggi manish punia khurshid sheela manmohan and lot many persons like these. i do not appreciate immature lecture by him like crores of indian citizen and this will prove after election result of states and parliament-dr.g.k.goel 
 
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
Sec 2(j)(x) of FCRA only defines a citizen of another country as a foreign sourcr and not a citizen of India even if resident abroad .So acceptance of any donation from a non resident Indian Citizen is fully permissible.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:45 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ravi
>
> Congress has too many big shot advocates and fixers, same goes for
> BJP, who know law at their fingertips. Poor AAP only has Prashant
> Bhushan, who made an ass of himself in High Court on the last to last
> hearing, and also failed to turn up on 23.Oct.
>
> The language of the law is clear, no money from overseas sources can
> be accepted by any political party. Prashant Bhushan made out some
> convoluted argument in court that they had been cleared of these
> charges in IAC times - Judge told him - IAC was not a political party,
> and in any case money went to PCRF and not IAC as you deposed in SC.
> AAP is a political party and will be reinvestigated for its sources of
> funding from the date you formed the party - 26.Nov.2012 !!~
>
> Then Bhushan made another silly argument - If NRIs now have the right
> to  vote (since 2010) then they have equally right to finance
> candidates for local elections and their money is not from a "foreign
> source". Hon'ble Judge asked him to read the definition of "foreign
> source" in FCRA - that shut him up (his face turned red) and he didn't
> show his face next hearing but sent his junior.
>
> The way it will now be rigged is the FCRA investigation of the foreign
> funds - which will be controlled by Congress (MHA - Chiddu). AAP was
> always a Congress dog, now they will be a LEASHED Congress dog. Who
> knows - Sonia may even make AK as her next CM for Delhi. Already all
> the top AAP brass are said to still have FIRs / cases pending (for
> rioting, destruction of public property etc.) so they are themselves
> eliminated by their own code of conduct.
>
> BJP knows this, I wouldn't be surprised if they try some appeal to
> AK's fake "Gandhian/Swarajist" conscience - Modi, Anna, Ramdev and
> other "eminent" citizens like Ramdas, Tahiliani,  VKS, Govindacharya
> etc. etc. may request that AAP should vacate the field in national
> interest and all sons and daughters of Bharat-mata should come
> together again to defeat anti-Swaraj forces..
>
> Ask yourself the real question, If AAP "kids" trip up on such
> elementary points of law, can we trust them to run 1 State let alone
> the Country without help from wiser people ?
>
> On 10/24/13, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wow! I thought it was the Congress that was THE foreign financed party and
>> liable to be banned for FCRA violations. How can AAP align with them?
>>
>> regards n bw
>>
>> ravi
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear IAC friends
>>>
>>> In a potentially welcome Delhi HC decision today for democracy, the
>>> foreign financed party is liable to be banned for FCRA violations..The
>>> Hoible Court has set the next date as 10 Dec 2013 2 days after the
>>> election
>>> result.
>>>
>>> This may influence AAP to side with Congress in event of a split verdict.
>> --
>> Veteran Major P M Ravindran
>> http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com/
>>
>> You may also like to visit:
>> 'Judiciary Watch' at http://www.vigilonline.com/
>> http://www.judicialreforms.org/
>> http://www.roguepolice.com/
>> http://milapchoraria.tripod.com/
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

 
hi,
 
Our *Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
1  Bhushan, who made an ass of himself in High Court on the last to last
> hearing, and also failed to turn up on 23.Oct.
2  Prashant Bhushan made out some
> convoluted argument in court that they had been cleared of these
> charges in IAC times - Judge told him
3  Then Bhushan made another silly argument
4  which will be controlled by Congress (MHA - Chiddu). AAP was
> always a Congress dog, now they will be a LEASHED Congress dog
 
choiciest words for all outside GOP
 
With warm regards
KNVENUGOPAL


On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 1:53 PM, Sainik Sangh <gs@sainiksangh.org> wrote:
NRIs are the biggest threat to India next to TALIBAN only
maj gen (rtd) chauhan
 
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Bina Goel
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections
 
yesterday at indore congress was painted as KASANGRESS while as this should have been painted as KANS GRACE- poll address by rahul can only be appreciated by persons who want to get benefited by CHAPLOOSI of rahul and sonia and these are diggi manish punia khurshid sheela manmohan and lot many persons like these. i do not appreciate immature lecture by him like crores of indian citizen and this will prove after election result of states and parliament-dr.g.k.goel 
 
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
Sec 2(j)(x) of FCRA only defines a citizen of another country as a foreign sourcr and not a citizen of India even if resident abroad .So acceptance of any donation from a non resident Indian Citizen is fully permissible.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:45 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ravi
>
> Congress has too many big shot advocates and fixers, same goes for
> BJP, who know law at their fingertips. Poor AAP only has Prashant
> Bhushan, who made an ass of himself in High Court on the last to last
> hearing, and also failed to turn up on 23.Oct.
>
> The language of the law is clear, no money from overseas sources can
> be accepted by any political party. Prashant Bhushan made out some
> convoluted argument in court that they had been cleared of these
> charges in IAC times - Judge told him - IAC was not a political party,
> and in any case money went to PCRF and not IAC as you deposed in SC.
> AAP is a political party and will be reinvestigated for its sources of
> funding from the date you formed the party - 26.Nov.2012 !!~
>
> Then Bhushan made another silly argument - If NRIs now have the right
> to  vote (since 2010) then they have equally right to finance
> candidates for local elections and their money is not from a "foreign
> source". Hon'ble Judge asked him to read the definition of "foreign
> source" in FCRA - that shut him up (his face turned red) and he didn't
> show his face next hearing but sent his junior.
>
> The way it will now be rigged is the FCRA investigation of the foreign
> funds - which will be controlled by Congress (MHA - Chiddu). AAP was
> always a Congress dog, now they will be a LEASHED Congress dog. Who
> knows - Sonia may even make AK as her next CM for Delhi. Already all
> the top AAP brass are said to still have FIRs / cases pending (for
> rioting, destruction of public property etc.) so they are themselves
> eliminated by their own code of conduct.
>
> BJP knows this, I wouldn't be surprised if they try some appeal to
> AK's fake "Gandhian/Swarajist" conscience - Modi, Anna, Ramdev and
> other "eminent" citizens like Ramdas, Tahiliani,  VKS, Govindacharya
> etc. etc. may request that AAP should vacate the field in national
> interest and all sons and daughters of Bharat-mata should come
> together again to defeat anti-Swaraj forces..
>
> Ask yourself the real question, If AAP "kids" trip up on such
> elementary points of law, can we trust them to run 1 State let alone
> the Country without help from wiser people ?
>
> On 10/24/13, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wow! I thought it was the Congress that was THE foreign financed party and
>> liable to be banned for FCRA violations. How can AAP align with them?
>>
>> regards n bw
>>
>> ravi
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear IAC friends
>>>
>>> In a potentially welcome Delhi HC decision today for democracy, the
>>> foreign financed party is liable to be banned for FCRA violations..The
>>> Hoible Court has set the next date as 10 Dec 2013 2 days after the
>>> election
>>> result.
>>>
>>> This may influence AAP to side with Congress in event of a split verdict.
>> --
>> Veteran Major P M Ravindran
>> http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com
>>
>> You may also like to visit:
>> 'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com
>> http://www.judicialreforms.org/
>> http://www.roguepolice.com
>> http://milapchoraria.tripod.com
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

RE: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

Sir,
 
NRIs are the lifeline of Bharat!


With Warm Wishes,
 
Manmohan Kumar

 

From: gs@sainiksangh.org
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; shantibhush@gmail.com; sroy.mb@gmail.com; raviforjustice@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:13:47 +0530
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

NRIs are the biggest threat to India next to TALIBAN only

maj gen (rtd) chauhan

 

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Bina Goel
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

 

yesterday at indore congress was painted as KASANGRESS while as this should have been painted as KANS GRACE- poll address by rahul can only be appreciated by persons who want to get benefited by CHAPLOOSI of rahul and sonia and these are diggi manish punia khurshid sheela manmohan and lot many persons like these. i do not appreciate immature lecture by him like crores of indian citizen and this will prove after election result of states and parliament-dr.g.k.goel 

 

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:

Sec 2(j)(x) of FCRA only defines a citizen of another country as a foreign sourcr and not a citizen of India even if resident abroad .So acceptance of any donation from a non resident Indian Citizen is fully permissible.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:45 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ravi
>
> Congress has too many big shot advocates and fixers, same goes for
> BJP, who know law at their fingertips. Poor AAP only has Prashant
> Bhushan, who made an ass of himself in High Court on the last to last
> hearing, and also failed to turn up on 23.Oct.
>
> The language of the law is clear, no money from overseas sources can
> be accepted by any political party. Prashant Bhushan made out some
> convoluted argument in court that they had been cleared of these
> charges in IAC times - Judge told him - IAC was not a political party,
> and in any case money went to PCRF and not IAC as you deposed in SC.
> AAP is a political party and will be reinvestigated for its sources of
> funding from the date you formed the party - 26.Nov.2012 !!~
>
> Then Bhushan made another silly argument - If NRIs now have the right
> to  vote (since 2010) then they have equally right to finance
> candidates for local elections and their money is not from a "foreign
> source". Hon'ble Judge asked him to read the definition of "foreign
> source" in FCRA - that shut him up (his face turned red) and he didn't
> show his face next hearing but sent his junior.
>
> The way it will now be rigged is the FCRA investigation of the foreign
> funds - which will be controlled by Congress (MHA - Chiddu). AAP was
> always a Congress dog, now they will be a LEASHED Congress dog. Who
> knows - Sonia may even make AK as her next CM for Delhi. Already all
> the top AAP brass are said to still have FIRs / cases pending (for
> rioting, destruction of public property etc.) so they are themselves
> eliminated by their own code of conduct.
>
> BJP knows this, I wouldn't be surprised if they try some appeal to
> AK's fake "Gandhian/Swarajist" conscience - Modi, Anna, Ramdev and
> other "eminent" citizens like Ramdas, Tahiliani,  VKS, Govindacharya
> etc. etc. may request that AAP should vacate the field in national
> interest and all sons and daughters of Bharat-mata should come
> together again to defeat anti-Swaraj forces..
>
> Ask yourself the real question, If AAP "kids" trip up on such
> elementary points of law, can we trust them to run 1 State let alone
> the Country without help from wiser people ?
>
> On 10/24/13, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wow! I thought it was the Congress that was THE foreign financed party and
>> liable to be banned for FCRA violations. How can AAP align with them?
>>
>> regards n bw
>>
>> ravi
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear IAC friends
>>>
>>> In a potentially welcome Delhi HC decision today for democracy, the
>>> foreign financed party is liable to be banned for FCRA violations..The
>>> Hoible Court has set the next date as 10 Dec 2013 2 days after the
>>> election
>>> result.
>>>
>>> This may influence AAP to side with Congress in event of a split verdict.

>> --
>> Veteran Major P M Ravindran
>> http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com
>>
>> You may also like to visit:
>> 'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com
>> http://www.judicialreforms.org/
>> http://www.roguepolice.com
>> http://milapchoraria.tripod.com


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

 


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Monday, October 28, 2013

RE: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

NRIs are the biggest threat to India next to TALIBAN only

maj gen (rtd) chauhan

 

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Bina Goel
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:38 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

 

yesterday at indore congress was painted as KASANGRESS while as this should have been painted as KANS GRACE- poll address by rahul can only be appreciated by persons who want to get benefited by CHAPLOOSI of rahul and sonia and these are diggi manish punia khurshid sheela manmohan and lot many persons like these. i do not appreciate immature lecture by him like crores of indian citizen and this will prove after election result of states and parliament-dr.g.k.goel 

 

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:

Sec 2(j)(x) of FCRA only defines a citizen of another country as a foreign sourcr and not a citizen of India even if resident abroad .So acceptance of any donation from a non resident Indian Citizen is fully permissible.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:45 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ravi
>
> Congress has too many big shot advocates and fixers, same goes for
> BJP, who know law at their fingertips. Poor AAP only has Prashant
> Bhushan, who made an ass of himself in High Court on the last to last
> hearing, and also failed to turn up on 23.Oct.
>
> The language of the law is clear, no money from overseas sources can
> be accepted by any political party. Prashant Bhushan made out some
> convoluted argument in court that they had been cleared of these
> charges in IAC times - Judge told him - IAC was not a political party,
> and in any case money went to PCRF and not IAC as you deposed in SC.
> AAP is a political party and will be reinvestigated for its sources of
> funding from the date you formed the party - 26.Nov.2012 !!~
>
> Then Bhushan made another silly argument - If NRIs now have the right
> to  vote (since 2010) then they have equally right to finance
> candidates for local elections and their money is not from a "foreign
> source". Hon'ble Judge asked him to read the definition of "foreign
> source" in FCRA - that shut him up (his face turned red) and he didn't
> show his face next hearing but sent his junior.
>
> The way it will now be rigged is the FCRA investigation of the foreign
> funds - which will be controlled by Congress (MHA - Chiddu). AAP was
> always a Congress dog, now they will be a LEASHED Congress dog. Who
> knows - Sonia may even make AK as her next CM for Delhi. Already all
> the top AAP brass are said to still have FIRs / cases pending (for
> rioting, destruction of public property etc.) so they are themselves
> eliminated by their own code of conduct.
>
> BJP knows this, I wouldn't be surprised if they try some appeal to
> AK's fake "Gandhian/Swarajist" conscience - Modi, Anna, Ramdev and
> other "eminent" citizens like Ramdas, Tahiliani,  VKS, Govindacharya
> etc. etc. may request that AAP should vacate the field in national
> interest and all sons and daughters of Bharat-mata should come
> together again to defeat anti-Swaraj forces..
>
> Ask yourself the real question, If AAP "kids" trip up on such
> elementary points of law, can we trust them to run 1 State let alone
> the Country without help from wiser people ?
>
> On 10/24/13, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wow! I thought it was the Congress that was THE foreign financed party and
>> liable to be banned for FCRA violations. How can AAP align with them?
>>
>> regards n bw
>>
>> ravi
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear IAC friends
>>>
>>> In a potentially welcome Delhi HC decision today for democracy, the
>>> foreign financed party is liable to be banned for FCRA violations..The
>>> Hoible Court has set the next date as 10 Dec 2013 2 days after the
>>> election
>>> result.
>>>
>>> This may influence AAP to side with Congress in event of a split verdict.

>> --
>> Veteran Major P M Ravindran
>> http://raviforjustice.blogspot.com
>>
>> You may also like to visit:
>> ‘Judiciary Watch’ at www.vigilonline.com
>> http://www.judicialreforms.org/
>> http://www.roguepolice.com
>> http://milapchoraria.tripod.com


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

 

Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: कांग्रेस पतन की ओर क्यों? - By Anuj agarwal, editor, Dialogue India

A good article indeed but seems anti-congress because as said that the opposition is equally responsible for the same then the author should also make opposition accountable for the cause! Nobody talks about a loby i.e. Anna & party? We should talk for solution and a comfortable/genuine fight for the eradication of congress raj from power! If BJP comes to power than what change may be expected if they are already equally accountable for the cause being in opposition. Why not the whole Anna lobi & experiment AAP for the better prospect of India. We should talke on these topics openly without prejudicely biased!



On Saturday, October 26, 2013 9:00 PM, Anuj Agrawal <dialogueindia.in@gmail.com> wrote:


वर्ष 2004 में बनी यूपीए की सरकार के समय प्रधानमंत्री पद के लिए जब
सोनिया गाँधी के नाम पर विवाद हुआ तो इसके पीछे सिर्फ और सिर्फ अमेरिका
था। सुब्रह्मण्यम स्वामी, सुषमा स्वराज, उमा भारती और गोविंदाचार्य आदि
सभी लोग अमेरिका के इशारे को समझ सोनिया के विदेशी मूल के होने का मुद्दा
उठाकर सोनिया को प्रधानमंत्री पद पर आने से रोकने में लग गये और अन्तत:
सोनिया को मनमोहन सिंह के नाम पर स्वीकृति देनी पड़ी। देश में पहली बार
एक मुखौटा सरकार जिसके दो संचालक हों, अस्तित्व में आयी। कांग्रेस पार्टी
के पतन का अध्याय यहीं से शुरू होता है। कुछ लोग कहेंगे कि यूपीए दो के
समय तो कांग्रेस पार्टी की सीटें बढ़ी हैं। ऐसे में कांग्रेस के पतन की
शुरूआत 2004 से क्यों आकी जा रही है? इस प्रश्न का उत्तर भी आगे के
विश्लेषण में परिलक्षित होता जायेगा।
दो सत्ता केन्द्रों को स्वीकृति देना कांग्रेस पार्टी और सोनिया की सबसे
बड़ी मूर्खता थी। कांग्रेसी नेता सोनिया की इस मजबूरी को समझ चुके थे कि
भारत की नीतियों पर अमेरिका लॉबी का कब्जा हो चुका हैं और मनमोहन सिंह
उसके प्रतिनिधि हैं। यह समझ देश के नौकरशाहों व अनेक केन्द्रीय मंत्रियों
व कांग्रेसी नेताओं के साथ-साथ कारपोरेट लॉबी को होना स्वाभाविक था और
विपक्षी दलों के शीर्ष नेताओं को भी। नीति निर्माण में अमेरिकी हितों का
ध्यान रखने की मनमोहन सिंह की कार्यप्रणाली से कांग्रेस व नौकरशाही व
कारपोरेट लॉबी का एक वर्ग मनमोहन सिंह के इर्द-गिर्द लामबंद (चंडीगढ़
क्लब) होता चला गया। यूपीए-एक में चूंकि कांग्रेस के पास कम सीटें थी और
अमेरिकी समर्थक नीतियों के दुष्परिणाम सामने नहीं आये थे, इस कारण 2009
के आम चुनावों में वामपंथियों के समर्थन वापस लेने के बाद भी बिखरे
विपक्ष के कारण यूपीए की वापसी हो गयी। किन्तु इस चुनावों तक कांग्रेसी
कार्यकर्ताओं की हाईकमान से दूरी बननी शुरू हो गयी थी और पार्टी
अवसरवाादियों, तथाकथित वामपंथी बुद्धिजीवियों व पूँजीपतियों की गिरफ्त
में आती गयी। 2009 के आम चुनावों पैसों के बल पर, खैरात बाँट कर,
विपक्षियों को भ्रमित कर तथा वोटिंग मशीनों में गड़बड़ी करके जीते गये थे
और कांग्रेस के खाते में लाख कोशिशों के बाद भी 11.5 करोड़ वोट व 208
सीटें ही आ पायी थी।ं
सन् 2009 की जीत ने सोनिया को साहसिक बना दिया और वे मनमोहन से इस्तीफा
माँग बैठीं। वे या तो स्वयं प्रधानमंत्री बनना चाहती थीं या राहुल को इस
पद पर बैठाना चाहती थीं। लेकिन अमेरिका के इशारे पर मनमोहन ने इस्तीफे से
इंकार कर दिया और राजनीति के पिछले तीन वर्ष सोनिया मनमोहन के बीच
'शीतयुद्ध' के गवाह हैं।
कांग्रेस पार्टी के पतन में सबसे बड़ी कारक स्वयं सोनिया ही है। उनका
विदेशी मूल का होना और ठीक से हिंदी नहीं बोल पाना, उन्हें कार्यकर्ताओं
से दूर कर देता है। वहीं राष्ट्रीय मुद्दों पर उनकी चुप्पी भी सभी को
अखरती है। दस जनपथ में उनकी कार्यशैली मुगल शासकों की याद दिलाती है जहाँ
व्यापारिक मानसिकता से राजकाज का संचालन किया जाता है। सोनिया का विभिन्न
पदों पर नियुक्तियों करने, ठेके दिलाने व परियोजनाओं को मंजूरी दिलाने की
संस्तुति देने का काम 'बोली लगाÓ काम उठाने जैसा है। वफादारों को अयोग्य
होते हुए भी उपकृत करना, यूरोपीय लॉबी को अधिकतम काम दिलाना और विभिन्न
मंत्रालयों व कांग्रेस शासित राज्यों में भी अपने 'विकास माफियाÓ का
नियंत्रण रखना शामिल है। कांग्रेस पार्टी में एक-एक कर जननेताओं का
हाशिये पर चले जाना भी सोनिया की सोची समझी राजनीति व भय का परिणाम है।
कांग्रेस शासित राज्यों के मुख्यमंत्री जनता से न जुड़े होकर 10 जनपथ से
अधिक जुड़े होते है और ऐसे में स्थानीय हितों की अनदेखी तो होती ही है,
व्यापक भ्रष्टाचार व अपसंस्कृति भी फैलती है। इससे कांग्रस पार्टी से
आमजन दूर होता गया।
सत्ता में बने रहने के लिए सोनिया गाँधी वोट बैंक की राजनीति खेलती रही
हैं। अल्पसंख्यकों, दलितों व जनजातियों को वोट बैंक के रूप में प्रयोग
कांग्रेस पार्टी की प्रिय शैली रही है। कमजोर वैचारिक धरातल की यह
राजनीति चमत्कार, मीडिया हाइप, आरक्षण, अनुदान, छात्रवृत्तियों, पेंशन,
विशेषधिकार आदि आदि देकर की जाती है। उच्च जातियों के शोषण की कहानियों
को बढ़ा-चढ़ाकर बताया जाती है और भ्रमित व उत्तेजित करने वाला साहित्य इन
वर्गों में बांटा जाता है। यह राजनीति वामपंथी व पेड बुद्धिजीवी, पेड
मीडिया, बहुराष्ट्रीय कम्पनियों व पेशेवर नेताओं (वफादार) के माध्यम से
खेला जाता है। निष्पक्ष काम करते दिख रहे एनजीओ, बुद्धिजीवी, विभिन्न
संगठन, चर्च, अल्पसंख्यकों की संस्थाएं, फिल्म निर्माता-निर्देशकों,
कलाकारों, लेखकों, रंगकर्मी आदि की एक पूरी शृंखला कांग्रेस पार्टी ने
खड़ी कर रखी है जो एक सुर में हाईकमान के इशारे पर गलत को सही व सही को
गलत साबित करते रहते हैं।
जिस प्रकार सोनिया व मनमोहन तथा कांग्रेस पार्टी व सरकार दो ध्रुवों में
बंटी हुई है किन्तु एक संतुलन बनाये रखने की कोशिश रहती है, ऐसा ही कुछ
नीतिगत स्तर पर है। वर्तमान में पूँजीवाद व बाजार की अंधी दौड़ को शुरू
करने वाली यह पार्टी कारपोरेट के हितों के अनुरूप व अमेरिका, रूस, अरब
देश, चीन व यूरोपियन यूनियन के फायदे की नीतियां बनाने में आतुर रहती है।
स्वाभाविक रूप से यह विशुद्ध व्यापार है जिसमें कांग्रेस पार्टी के लोग
अपने व्यावसायिक हित सर्वोपरि रखते हैं और यही हित कांग्रेस पार्टी के
पतन का कारण हैं।
फोच्र्यून 500 कम्पनियों को खेल में अब भारत फंस चुका है। सोनिया-मनमोहन
दोनों गुट इन कम्पनियों के फायदे के लिए जो भी नीतिगत फैसला करते है,
उससे भारतीयों के परम्परागत व्यापार, उद्योगों व कृषि पर नकारात्मक असर
पड़ता ही है। लोगों की नौकारियां छिनना, जमीन हड़पना, बेरोजगार होना और
महँगाई का शिकार होना अब भारतीयों की जिंदगी का हिस्सा बन चुका है।
स्थिति इतनी बुरी है कि सरकार को 67 करोड़ लोगों को खाद्य सुरक्षा देने
की घोषणा करनी पड़ी है। यानी लूट का कुचक्र देश की दो तिहाई जनता को
गरीबी की रेखा के नीचे धकेल चुका है। एक बेहतर जिंदगी जी रहा या जीने की
आस में जी रहा यह वर्ग निश्चित रूप से सरकार व कांग्रेस पार्टी से नाराज
है और खाद्य, स्वास्थ्य, मजदूरी, शिक्षा आदि के अधिकारों की जगह रोजगार
मांग रहा है जो कांग्रेस पार्टी दे नहीं सकती। इस कारण जातीय व
सांप्रदायिक हिंसा, नक्सलवाद, क्षेत्रवाद व भाषायी झगड़ों की राजनीति को
जानबूझकर योजनाबद्ध तरीके से बढ़ाया जा रहा है। किन्तु आम जनता में
जानकारी व समझ विकसित होने से कांग्रेस पार्टीं के प्रति नाराजगी व
आक्रोश बढ़ता जा रहा है
कांग्रेस पार्टी के कारपोरेटवाद व बाजार बाद का सबसे बड़ा शिकारी मध्यम
वर्ग व उच्च वर्ग है। यह रोज खर्च करता है और खूब खर्च करता है। इसको
लूटने के लिए क्रिकेट, पोर्न, क्लब, नशा, फिल्में व मनोरंजन के चैनल,
कम्यूटर, इंटनेट, मोबाईल,फोन, गैजेटस के साथ पाश्चात्य जीवन शैली को
परोसा गया जो मस्ती व लापरवाह जिंदगी की ओर ले जाती है। एक षड्यंत्र के
तहत विदेशी सामान, उपभोक्तावाद, चमचमाते अस्पताल और महंगी बीमारियां,
चमचमाते निजी शिक्षा संस्थान (अंदर से खोखली कबाड़ फैक्टरी), मॉल कल्चर
नयी पीढ़ी को परोसी गयी। धीरे-धीरे लालच की हद बढ़ गयी और सभी उपभोक्ता
सामनों के दाम बढ़ते गये हैं और मध्यम व उच्च वर्ग की आमदनी व बचत उनकी
जेब से निकल बड़ी कम्पनियों के खातों में चली गयी है। अब कर्ज, ईएमआई,
तनाव, क्रेडिट कार्ड, बेरोजगारी, दिशाहीनता, जड़ो से कटाव, अनुपयोगी
शिक्षा लिये यह वर्ग चौराट्टे पर खड़ा है, और एक प्रतिशत उच्चतम वर्ग इस
लूट को विदेशों में पहुंचा चुका है। देश में महंगाई, मंदी, मुद्रा स्फीति
व बेरोजगारी सभी बढ़ रहे हैं। घोटालों के द्वारा लूट, शेयर सट्टे द्वारा
लूट, महंगाई द्वारा लूट, उपभोक्तावाद द्वारा लूट का जो कुचक्र कांग्रेस
पार्टी ने खड़ा किया है, वह इसके लिए भस्मासुर बन गया है।
कांग्रेस पार्टी का संगठन व नेतृत्व भी कमाल के हैं। संगठन है ही नहीं व
70 प्रतिशत से अधिक नेता दूसरे दलों से यहाँ आये हुए हैं। अगर सच कहें तो
मनसबदारी प्रथा के समान ठेके उठा दिये गये हैं, वफादारी मापदण्ड है और
लूट का हिस्सा देते रहना पद पर बने रहने की गारंटी। यह जनता के हितों को
संरक्षित करने वाली पार्टी रही ही नहीं, यह अल्पसंख्यकों व अवसरवाादियों
का गठजोड़ है जो सिर्फ और सिर्फ शासन करने व लूटतंत्र का राज बनाये रखने
को आतुर है और किसी भी संवैधानिक संस्था की बाट लगा देता है, किसी की भी
गरिमा भंग कर सकता है और किसी भी स्तर तक जा सकता है। 'ठेका पद्धतिÓ की
यह शैली अब बहुसंख्यक समुदाय को समझ आ गयी है और वह 'बांटो व राज करोÓ के
षड्यंत्र को समझ चुका है और वह अब एकजुट हो रहा है, ऐसे में कांग्रेस का
पतन तय हैं। कहा जाता है कि जब प्रमुख कांग्रेसी नेता व यूपीए के सहयोगी
दलों के नेता अपने पोर्टफोलियो में बदलाव करते हैं तब दुनिया के शेयर
बाजारों में खासी हलचल मच जाती है। डॉलर-पौंड-रूबल-यूरो-दिनार की विनिमय
दरों के उतार-चढ़ाव भी इन नेताओं की ही देन हैं। अब इस खेल को पूरा देश
समझ चुका है अत: इनसे निजात चाहता है और यही कांग्रेस के पतन का कारण बन
गया है।
कांग्रेस के काले कारनामों में भागीदार सभी देश व उनका पोषित मीडिया भारत
में उपभोक्तावाद, मानवाधिकार नारीवाद, सुशासन, पारदर्शिता, कानून के शासन
व लोकतंत्र के विकास संबंधी आंदोलनों को वित्तीय सहायता देते रहे है। यह
एक और छलावा होता है, जो इनके कुकर्मों को ढांपने के काम आता है। जनता
समझ चुकी है कि विभिन्न नक्सली गुटों, चर्च, मदरसों, पिछड़ी, दलित व
जनजातीय, भाषाई व क्षेत्रीय अंदोलनों को भी यही देश संरक्षण व धन देते है
तो आतंकवादियों को भी। इस दूहरे खेल का शिकार अब जनता नहीं बनना चाहती और
न ही अपने देश को प्रयोगों का मैदान बनाना चाहती है अत: कांग्रेस का पतन
तय है। जनता समझ चुकी है कि सोनिया प्रभावहीन है, मनमोहन कठपुतली है और
राहुल अपरिपक्व है और शेष कांग्रेसी पुराने कांग्रेसियों के बच्चे हैं,
इनमें जन नेता कोई नहीं है, भारत की बात करने वाला भी कोई नहीं। यह
मुगल-ब्रिटिश शासन की अंतिम कड़ी आधे मुगल और आधे अंग्रेज है जिनसे निजात
पाना जरूरी है। इसके बाद जो कोई भी विकल्प आयेगा वह इसके बेहतर व भारतीय
होगा बस इनसे मुक्ति मिले।

पतन के कारण
* राहूल गाँधी की अपरिपक्वता
* सोनिया की गैर जवाबदेही
* मनमोहन गैर राजनीतिक व्यक्तिव
* प्रणव चिदंबरम का युद्ध
* कांग्रेसी प्रवक्ताओं की दबंगई शैली वाले बयान
* सांप्रदायिक नीतियां
* अल्पसंख्यकपरस्त वोट बैंक की राजनीति
* सांस्कृतिक प्रतीकों का अपमान
* 70 प्रतिशत बाहरी नेता
* सहयोगी दलों का भ्रष्टाचार
* भ्रष्टाचार, लूट व घोटाले
* पेड मीडिया/पत्रकार व वामपंथी बुद्धिजीवियों को प्रश्रय
* पश्चिमी माफिया
* अतिबाजारवादी नीतियां
* बेरोजगारी, महंगाई व मंदी
* सीबीआई का दुरूपयोग
* जन आंदोलनों के कारण उपजा जनाक्रोश
* मोदी पर आक्रमण
* क्रिकेट, पोर्न, सट्टे व फिल्मी अश्लीलता व भौंडेपन को बढ़ावा देना।
* नक्सलवाद, चर्च व एनजीओ (विदेशी फंडेंड) को प्रश्रय
* दबंगई की राजनीति
* बांटो एवं राज करो का खेल
* संवैधानिक संस्थाओं का अपमान
* सोनिया की बीमारी
* मुगल शैली का माफिया राज
* सोनिया मनमोहन व प्रमुख नेताओं की बढ़ती उम्र
* सत्ता विरोधी जन रूझान
काश कांग्रेस ऐसा करती!
1. देश के औद्योगिक विकास को गति देती और विदेशों से माल मांगने पर रोक लगाती।
2. पार्टी को संगठनात्मक रूप से मजबूत करती और जन नेताओं को यथोचित
सम्मान देती तथा जनभावनाओं की कदर करती।
3. परिवार वाद से मुक्त हो पाती।
4. बांटो और राज करो के स्थान पर देश की आत्मा व सांस्कृतिक स्वरूप को
समझती और पहचानती तथा देश कोर समग्र विकास का नक्शा बनाती।
5. पार्टी में आंतरिक लोकतंत्र की स्थापना करती।



--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Anuj Agrawal, Editor Dialogue India
www.dialogueindia.in
Mob. 9811424443

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

Although I am not a blind supporter of any political party, after seeing this post, one thing comes to mind.

The Supreme Court is asking for foreign funding of the AAP. The other political parties are also raising questions.

But one thing is clear, that AAP has atleast a known source of all its funding where as most other political parties do not have the known source of funding. It could be even ISI

So why not ban all the political parties in the country who cannot tell you the source of even a single rupee in their fund??
 
Vineet Ruia
President
Bharat Bachao Sangathan
Kolkata


"RIGHT is the right to fight the MIGHT,
MIGHT is never a source to achieve the RIGHT"


On Saturday, 26 October 2013 9:11 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
A careful look at the definition of foreign source shows that it focusses on the personality of the donor  and not the place from where he is donating. Even if a foreign Citizen comes to India converts his dollars into Indian rupees and donates to a political party it will still qualify as a donation from a forign source.Likewise if an Indian Citizen while on a visit abroad remits a donation from outside India it will not qualify as one from a foreign source .That is why the isisue is beyond any doubt whatsoever.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 25, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Sir

There is a vast body of case law on the subject.

For convenience I can refer to the decision in IAC's very own "Veeresh Malik versus Indian Olympic Association" in Delhi High Court - which decision incidentally is the bedrock for political parties being brought under RTI.by CIC. Please read para 44 onwards from the said judgment.

http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/SRB/judgement/20-01-2010/SRB07012010CW8762007.pdf

In short, the term "include" is used to ENLARGE the language of the statute, and it usage is ordinarily not construed/restricted as "means" (as you have used it).

Nonetheless, the language of the statute under examination is perfectly clear on "foreign sources", even if we take the ordinary or dictionary meanings of the 2 terms.

"Foreign" means "from outside". If currency comes from outside India it is "foreign". This aspect was also clearly debated at time of amending the Rep. of Peoples Act in 2010.

Today when an NRI cannot vote from outside India, the question of his donating money from outside for political activity is excluded equally. We saw very well what happened during the Khalistani, Naga, Tamil etc. separatist movements which were foreign funded by NRIs to wage war against the Indian State. As patriots we cannot permit this and neither should we defend such dangerous propositions.

Sarbajit


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
The use of the wotd include further show that if a foreign citizen had to be expressly included an Indian Citzen resident outside India could not be deemed to be included just by implication.Nobody can have the least doubt in the matter.

Sent from my iPad






Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

I fully agree with you. Any donation in the foreign currency should be banned. It is required to nip the evil in the bud. One can understand the movements for(I )Khalistan, LTTE etc . They should have banned in the bud to save the country integration.
 
Dr N C Jain
27-10-13
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMHO, AAP may be banned after Delhi elections

Sir

There is a vast body of case law on the subject.

For convenience I can refer to the decision in IAC's very own "Veeresh Malik versus Indian Olympic Association" in Delhi High Court - which decision incidentally is the bedrock for political parties being brought under RTI.by CIC. Please read para 44 onwards from the said judgment.

http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/SRB/judgement/20-01-2010/SRB07012010CW8762007.pdf

In short, the term "include" is used to ENLARGE the language of the statute, and it usage is ordinarily not construed/restricted as "means" (as you have used it).

Nonetheless, the language of the statute under examination is perfectly clear on "foreign sources", even if we take the ordinary or dictionary meanings of the 2 terms.

"Foreign" means "from outside". If currency comes from outside India it is "foreign". This aspect was also clearly debated at time of amending the Rep. of Peoples Act in 2010.

Today when an NRI cannot vote from outside India, the question of his donating money from outside for political activity is excluded equally. We saw very well what happened during the Khalistani, Naga, Tamil etc. separatist movements which were foreign funded by NRIs to wage war against the Indian State. As patriots we cannot permit this and neither should we defend such dangerous propositions.

Sarbajit


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:
The use of the wotd include further show that if a foreign citizen had to be expressly included an Indian Citzen resident outside India could not be deemed to be included just by implication.Nobody can have the least doubt in the matter.

Sent from my iPad






Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Re: [IAC#RG] AAM AADMI Party needs for reaching the voters

Dear Sir,
'Giving a Chance' mentality has been harming India and all indians.
We have to be careful while voting for AAP or any other party.
Neeraj Gupta


On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM, CA. DILIP KR. SINGH <cadilipksingh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Friend,

Let us give a chance to AAP to prove what do they claim. Yes we have given chance to CONGRESS, BJP, SP, BSP, AIADMK, CPI etc. Yes in the coming election we all Indian should vote for AAM AADMI PARTY to give them a chance to prove themselves.

Thanks.


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Girendra Singh <badhotia@gmail.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (badhotia@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Dear indiaresists controllers,

Sir, 

It is every high time when the indiaresists should keep a soft corner to those persons who are supporting AAP for the right cause! It's very dishonest that while i replied to the earlier posts, i received the messages to block.... etc. etc. i am not so familiar with the internet functions but still know to use it. If Anna, Baba, Gen. V.K. Singh and Miss Bedi don't come on a single platform to give them (corrupt persons) a strong fight and their support to AAP (atleast in Delhi Assembly Elections)... there will be no right fight except sending them our objections.
Girendra Singh
AAP Supporter


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Hari Goyal <haridgoyal@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Venkatachelam, 

Sir, 

We are to see the end results of any move of the political parties.
Move of AAP is to awaken the masses not to vote for the corrupt 
persons who have huge unaccounted black money stashed abroad. 

HARI GOYAL
AAP Supporter


Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:05:23 +0530
From: nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] AAM AADMI PARTY'S MONEY COLLECTION DRIVE

To

India Against Corruption 

                           AAM  AADMI  PARTY'S  MONEY COLLECTION DRIVE


Money power is the bane of Indian electoral process.  Money power is the beginning of political corruption  and with unending cancerous growth. It is distressing that all political parties have great faith  in money power much more than people power and Aam Aadmi party has proved itself to be no exception.
Every political party collects money by coercion, threats and quid pro quo with commercial and industrial establishments and business men .  Many political parties often organise functions where the political leaders are supposed to be weighed by silver, garlanded with lakhs of rupee notes etc.  These are all obviously some methods of converting their black money into white for accounting purposes.  Rarely, people donate money to these political parties voluntarily and willingly  and even if done, it would not be a large amount.  However, all the political parties  claim that the money collected by them is by way of donation given voluntarily. Many say that they are accounted  and may also give  accounts  which may be fake.  Aam Aadmi party also claims that the money collected are voluntary donation.
It is reported in the media  that Aam Aadmi party has already mobilised over Rs.10.49 crore  and it still wants more  and is feverishly continuing it's money collection drive.   
If a party believes  that it enjoys popularity and has the support of the people, it really does not need this sort of money. When the emphasis  is on money power rather than people power to get votes, then certainly that political party will end up as one of any other political party in India. By indulging in such money collection drive, Aam Aadmi party has   given one more slap on the face of the Indian voter and those who believe in healthy and vibrant democratic process under the guidance of honest and selfless leaders. 
N/.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in




--
CA. DILIP KR. SINGH          
              B.Com, FCA          
Partner    - ADS & Co., Chartered Accountants
CEO         - GREEN CAPITAL 
                  (Managing Your Wealth - Assured Return @18% pa.)
203, Saraswati Complex, B-7, Subhash Chowk, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi - 110092

STRENGTH IS LIFE, WEAKNESS IS DEATH.
 
Please do NOT Vote for the present Government in the next General Elections,
unless they Pass Jan LokPal  & Right to Recall!
We want 100% LITERACY, JUSTICE , SWARAJ & CORRUPTION FREE BHARAT.
Jai Hind! Jai Bharat!
भारत जागो ! विश्व जगाओ !! :: Wake Up Bharat ! Enlighten The World !!
"They alone live who live for others, the rest are more dead than alive. 

To BE GOOD and to DO GOOD - that is the whole of Religion.

Arise! Awake! And Stop Not Till The Goal is Reached." - SWAMI VIVEKANANDA

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in